play_arrow

keyboard_arrow_right

Listeners:

Top listeners:

skip_previous skip_next
00:00 00:00
playlist_play chevron_left
volume_up
  • play_arrow

    Omanyano ovanhu koikundaneki yomalungula kashili paveta, Commisiner Sakaria takunghilile Veronika Haulenga

Namibia

The Red Line Debate: Economic Risks of Removing Namibia’s Veterinary Cordon Fence

todayJanuary 25, 2025 28

Background
share close
By Brian Black
Namibia’s Veterinary Cordon Fence, commonly known as the “Red Line,” has been the subject of intense debate in recent years. While critics argue that the Red Line perpetuates inequality and limits access to lucrative markets for communal farmers north of the fence, its removal could pose significant economic risks for the country.
To understand the implications, it is essential to consider the purpose of the Red Line. This veterinary cordon fence was established to protect Namibia’s livestock industry—one of the country’s economic backbones—from diseases like foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) and contagious bovine pleuropneumonia. These diseases are endemic in regions where wildlife such as buffaloes roam freely. Namibia is one of only a handful of African countries that has managed to secure international recognition as an FMD-free zone south of the Red Line.
This status is critical for accessing premium export markets in Europe, Asia, and beyond. Namibia’s beef exports, valued at billions of Namibian dollars annually, are a cornerstone of the agricultural sector, sustaining thousands of jobs and contributing significantly to the national GDP. Removing the Red Line would expose the entire country to the risk of FMD outbreaks, which could lead to devastating trade embargoes and economic losses.
Economic Risks of Removing the Red Line
1. Loss of International Market Access
Namibia’s ability to export beef to high-value markets hinges on its FMD-free status. Without the Red Line, the entire country could lose this designation. Export bans would be inevitable in the event of an outbreak, as international markets have zero tolerance for FMD. The economic fallout would ripple through the supply chain, from commercial farmers to abattoirs and exporters.
2. Collapse of the Commercial Livestock Sector
Namibia’s commercial livestock industry south of the Red Line is highly integrated into global markets. An FMD outbreak would not only halt exports but also devalue livestock across the board. Farmers would face financial ruin, leading to widespread unemployment and reduced tax revenue for the government.
3. Increased Veterinary Costs
Containing an FMD outbreak is both expensive and time-consuming. Vaccination campaigns, culling infected animals, and monitoring disease spread would require massive public and private sector investments. These costs would far outweigh the perceived benefits of removing the Red Line.
4. Impact on Communal Farmers
Ironically, removing the Red Line could harm the very communal farmers it is meant to benefit. Without effective disease control measures, livestock in communal areas would be at greater risk of infection, reducing their market value and productivity. This would deepen poverty in already vulnerable communities.
Lessons from Other African Countries
It is worth noting that no country on the African continent has successfully eradicated FMD without a veterinary cordon fence or similar control measures. In regions where buffaloes coexist with livestock, the risk of disease transmission is a constant threat. Countries that have attempted to relax their veterinary controls have faced catastrophic consequences, including prolonged trade bans and economic setbacks.
The Way Forward
The Red Line is not without its challenges, particularly for farmers north of the fence who are excluded from lucrative export markets. However, removing the Red Line is not the solution. Instead, Namibia should focus on innovative approaches to integrate communal farmers into the broader economy without compromising the country’s FMD-free status.
Possible interventions include:
• Establishing disease-free zones north of the Red Line through rigorous vaccination and monitoring programs.
• Investing in abattoirs and processing facilities in the northern regions to create local value chains.
• Expanding domestic markets for livestock products to reduce reliance on exports.
Conclusion
The Red Line is more than just a fence; it is a safeguard for Namibia’s agricultural economy. Removing it without a comprehensive and well-funded disease control strategy would expose the country to severe economic risks. Instead of dismantling the Red Line, Namibia should seek balanced solutions that protect its livestock industry while addressing the legitimate concerns of communal farmers.
The stakes are too high to gamble with Namibia’s economic future.
* Brian Black is the Windhoek East constituency councillor

Written by: Wonder Guchu

Rate it

Similar posts

Dr. Sam Nujoma

Leaders extend well wishes to Nujoma

https://youtu.be/L3Sdy5wWsgA   By: Envaalde Matheus National leaders have extended messages of support to Namibia’s Founding President, Sam Nujoma, who is hospitalized at Lady Pohamba Private Hospital in Windhoek. Samuel Shafiishuna Daniel Nujoma, born May 12, 1929, in Etunda village, Omusati Region, is a towering figure in Namibia’s history. As the […]

todayFebruary 7, 2025 19