EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Activist Rinaani Musutua Criticizes Namibia’s National Budget and Socio-Economic Disparities

In a passionate and critical address, activist Rinaani Musutua expressed deep disappointment with the recently announced national budget by Namibia’s Minister of Finance, Iipumbu Shiimi. Musutua specifically highlighted the inadequate increase in the old age pension, a decision that deviates from the promises made by the late President Hage Geingob. The activist voiced concerns about growing socio-economic disparities, the lavish lifestyles of government officials, and the urgent need for comprehensive reforms to address these issues.

Disappointment in Old Age Pension Increase:

At the core of Musutua’s critique is the government’s decision to raise the old age pension to N$1,600 per month. This increment falls far short of the expectations set by the late President Geingob, who had promised to work towards reaching N$2,000, and eventually N$3,000. Musutua expressed disappointment on behalf of the entire nation, emphasizing the stark contrast between the promised increase and the actual outcome.

Lavish Lifestyles of Government Officials:

The activist drew attention to the lavish lifestyles enjoyed by government officials, juxtaposed against the struggles of the elderly living on meager pensions. She highlighted the various allowances, perks, and benefits received by government officials, including housing, entertainment, telephone, furniture, and clothing allowances. She criticized the lack of efforts by long-serving government officials to invest in industries that could generate employment opportunities for the youth.

Corruption and Inequality:

The activist vehemently criticized the apparent lack of accountability in government, pointing to corruption and illicit financial flows that drain the country’s resources. Rinaani expressed frustration with the current state of affairs, where a select few benefit while the majority of the population faces poverty and inequality. The call for accountability and transparency resonates strongly, especially as she highlighted the stark reality of the widening gap between the rich and the poor in Namibia.

Universal Basic Income Grant:

Musutua advocated for a universal basic income grant as a potential solution to alleviate poverty and bridge the economic gap. She argued that a more equitable distribution of resources is necessary to uplift the entire society, emphasizing that the current situation is unsustainable and detrimental to the well-being of the nation.

Comparison with Botswana:

Drawing a comparison with Botswana, Rinaani praised the social policies in place in the neighboring country, where children receive free food, and citizens have access to grants for a decent standard of living. She contrasted this with Namibia’s lack of opportunities, prompting many Namibians to seek better prospects abroad. The activist urged Namibian leaders to learn from successful models and prioritize the well-being of their citizens.

Conclusion:

Rinaani Musutua’s impassioned critique sheds light on the stark realities facing Namibians, particularly the elderly, and the pressing need for socio-economic reforms. The disappointment expressed in response to the national budget reflects broader concerns about governance, accountability, and the overall direction of the nation. As Namibians grapple with these challenges, Musutua’s call for change resonates as a plea for a more equitable and just society.